The Guthrie Clinic v. Convergence CT, Inc.
| The Guthrie Clinic |
| Convergence CT, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv01396 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
AMENDED DOCUMENT by Convergence CT, Inc.. Corrected Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, for a More Definite Statement, and to Strike Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 12(e), and 12(f). (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Unpublished Opinions)(Levy, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
REPLY BRIEF re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and to Strike Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) filed by Convergence CT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Unpublished Opinions)(Levy, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and to Strike Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) filed by The Guthrie Clinic. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s), #2 Proposed Order)(Patton, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and to Strike Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) filed by Convergence CT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Brier, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter to Counsel Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 8/28/2023. (ea)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and to Strike Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) by Convergence CT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brier, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Convergence CT, Inc. from Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-113. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 6377184), filed by Convergence CT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - County Information, #2 Exhibit B - Diversity Disclosure Statement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Guthrie Clinic v. Convergence CT, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Guthrie Clinic | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Patton |
| Represented By: | Jan L. Budman, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Convergence CT, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brian J. Levy |
| Represented By: | Daniel T. Brier |
| Represented By: | Frank J. Brier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
