Kovalchuk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Yelena Kovalchuk |
Bureau of Prisons and Pennsylvania Attorney General |
4:2024cv00227 |
February 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
MP |
Matthew W Brann |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #4 Order to Show Cause, by Yelena Kovalchuk. (ea) |
Receipt of payment from Yelena Kovalchuk in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 2/9/2024. Receipt number 333108402 processed by CP. (jjs) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this Order, Kovalchuk shall show cause as to why her Section 2255 petition should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. If Kovalchuk fails to timely respond to this Order, the Court will dismiss her Section 2254 petition without prejudice and close this case. Show Cause Response due by 3/1/2024. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 2/9/2024. (ea) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333108402 (ep) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 Notice & Consent) (ea) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Yelena Kovalchuk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Supreme Court Document) (ea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.