Kerstetter v. Geisinger Health et al
Catelin Kerstetter |
Geisinger Health, Geisinger Health doing business as Geisinger Health Foundation, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Medical Center doing business as Geisinger Medical Center Danville, Geisinger System Services and Mary Connell |
4:2024cv00940 |
June 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Julia K Munley |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mary Connell, Geisinger Health, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger System Services and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (cp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mary Connell, Geisinger Health, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger System Services ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6663509), filed by Catelin Kerstetter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.