Johnson v. McGinley et al
Armoni Masud Johnson |
Pennsylvania Parole Board, Thomas McGinley, D. Varner, Amy Wheary, Mrs. Fisher and Keri Moore |
4:2024cv00992 |
June 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
MP |
Matthew W Brann |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Armoni Masud Johnson. (ea) |
Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's #8 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED only to the extent that Plaintiff shall have an additional 20 days (as requested), or until 8/20/2024, to file his amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to resend the relevant excepts of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of Court to Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 8/5/2024. (ea) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Armoni Masud Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (ea) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 6) sent to Armoni Johnson returned. Envelope states "Refused, Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward." (Spoke to the mail room at SCI Coal Township, they stated their system shows the inmate number is incorrect. Clerk confirmed that we did have the correct inmate number on the envelope. They instructed to resend the documents.) Doc. 6 being resent today to Johnson at SCI Coal Township. (ea) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Johnson's #1 complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Johnson shall have 21 days from the date of this Order in which to file an appropriate amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and today's Order. Defendants' pending #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DISMISSED as moot and without prejudice. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 7/10/2024. (ea) |
Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re [1-1] Complaint filed by Mrs. Fisher, Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Pennsylvania Parole Board, D. Varner, Amy Wheary.(Yarish, Mary Katherine) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re [1-1] Complaint by Mrs. Fisher, Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Pennsylvania Parole Board, D. Varner, Amy Wheary. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yarish, Mary Katherine) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Katherine M Yarish on behalf of Mrs. Fisher, Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Pennsylvania Parole Board, D. Varner, Amy Wheary (Yarish, Mary Katherine) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amy Wheary, Pennsylvania Parole Board, Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Mrs. Fisher, D. Varner from Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County, case number CV-24-0931. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAMDC-6670988), filed by Amy Wheary, Pennsylvania Parole Board, Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Mrs. Fisher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Removal from Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(lp) Modified on 6/17/2024 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.