HAYNES INTERNATIONAL v. ELECTRALLOY
Plaintiff: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: ELECTRALLOY
Case Number: 1:2004cv00197
Filed: July 15, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: Maurice B. Cohill
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 OPINION re 16 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts 1 and 2 filed by HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC., re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ELECTRALLOY. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/23/2009. (sjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL v. ELECTRALLOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Represented By: Lynn J. Alstadt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELECTRALLOY
Represented By: Dennis P. McCooe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?