THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. NOVOTNY et al
| THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT |
| RUDOLPH A. NOVOTNY and KAREN J. NOVOTNY |
| 1:2007cv00262 |
| September 24, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 86 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Third Request for Production of Documents. AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2012, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaint iff's Motion to Compel is hereby granted with respect to those documents listed in Defendants' privilege log over which the accountant-client privilege has been asserted. Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to produce those documents on or before June 29, 2012. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 6/8/12. (jdg)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER AMENDING 55 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2009, this Courts Order of June 11, 2009, is hereby amended as follows: Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the liquidated amount of $576,551.06 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 10/22/09. (jdg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
