DUHRING RESOURCE COMPANY v. THE FOREST SERVICE et al
| DUHRING RESOURCE COMPANY |
| THE FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE, KATHLEEN S. MORSE, ROBERT T. FALLON, ANTHONY V. SCARDINA and ROBERT A. STOVALL |
| 1:2007cv00314 |
| November 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Warren |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
ORDER granting 166 Motion to Stay and directing Clerk to mark case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/1/10. (map)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER setting Oral Argument re 132 Motion for Summary Judgment, 136 Motion for Summary Judgment and 148 Motion for Summary Judgment for 1/13/2010 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 3A; Court is specifically interested in hearing how the recent decision in Minard Run Co. et al. v. United States Forest Service, Case No. 1:09-cv-125 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2009) has impacted the parties' positions with respect to the pending motions for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/22/09. (map)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 135 Motion to Supplement Administrative Record as stated more fully in order and granting 139 Motion to Complete the Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/11/09. (map)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER denying 115 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/20/09. (map)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion to Dismiss and 78 Motion to Dismiss; Counts II, VI, VII, VIII, and XI of the second amended complaint are dismissed, with prejudice; Count I is dismissed to the extent it is asserted against the individual federal defendants; 80 Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention and 85 Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention are also granted in part and denied in part; Counts II, VI, and VII of the complaint in intervention are dismissed, with prejudice; Count I is dismissed to the extent it is asserted against the individual federal defendants; 69 Joint Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied as moot; 106 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief is denied on the ground that it is untimely and prejudicial. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/5/09. (map)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
