ADAMS v. THE COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA et al
| A. J. ADAMS |
| THE COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA, MARK A. DIVECCHIO, JOHN A. ONORATO, ANTHONY A. LOGUE, DAVID C. AGRESTI and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2007cv00316 |
| November 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion for Relief. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 09/27/2012. (kas)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 30th Day of September, 2011, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 55 shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Accordingly, as to the Plaintiff's remaining claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff A.J. Adams. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 09/30/2011. (kas)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 19th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion 35 to Strike Amended Complaint, and based upon the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' motion be, and hereb y is, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be reasserted by way of a subsequent Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Rule 56 motion, or motion in limine, if appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the Plaintiff having adequately clarified the nature of his intended causes of action against the Defendants in his "Response 39 to Defendants Motion to Strike Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(f) and For a More Definite Statement Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(e)," the Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement be, and h ereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall, on or before December 3, 2009, file an Amended Complaint which comports with the clarification set forth in his Response 39 to Defendants' Motion to Strike Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(f) and For a More Definite Statement Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(e). Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 11/19/2009. (kas)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 23rd day of September, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff's Motion 29 for Leave to File Proposed Second Amended Co mplaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Said motion is GRANTED insofar as the Plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985; and 2. Said motion is DENIED insofar as the Plaintiff seeks leave to amend h is RICO claim in Count 2 and is further DENIED to the extent that any of the Plaintiff's remaining claims purport to name either Fiore Leone or Dominick DiPaolo as Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion 31 for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint which comports with the foregoing directives. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 09/23/09. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
