BARKER v. KEYSTONE POWDERED METAL CO.
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. BARKER
Defendant: KEYSTONE POWDERED METAL CO.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00075
Filed: March 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Elk
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION that 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by KEYSTONE POWDERED METAL CO. is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 3/31/10. (lrw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARKER v. KEYSTONE POWDERED METAL CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. BARKER
Represented By: James H. Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEYSTONE POWDERED METAL CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?