HINTERBERGER v. IROQUOIS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
| HEATHER HINTERBERGER |
| IROQUOIS SCHOOL DISTRICT and SALLY LOFTUS |
| 1:2008cv00317 |
| November 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Erie |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT granting in part and denying in part 91 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TAXATION OF COSTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1). Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 04/14/14. (mcp)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF JUDGMENT: AND NOW, to wit, this 26th Day of September, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment 75 shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Said motion is DENIED insofar as it relates to Plaintiff's §1983 claim against Defendant Sally Loftus; and 2. Said motion is GRANTED insofar as it relates to Plaintiff's &# 167;1983 claims against the Iroquois School District. In accordance with the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that JUDGMENT shall be, and here by is, ENTERED in favor of the Iroquois School District and against Plaintiff Heather Hinterberger as to Counts II and VI of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 09/26/2012. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
