BERARDI v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
JOHN BERARDI |
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, SCOTT DODRILL and HARLEY LAPPIN |
1:2009cv00137 |
June 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
McKean |
Sean J. McLaughlin |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot; adopting 14 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 12/1/2009. (rlh) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JOHN BERARDI, which he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241, be dismissed as moot. Objections to R&R due by 11/16/2009. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 10/29/09. (lrw) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that 2 Petitioner's Request for Temporary and Permanent Injunction is DENIED; adopting 6 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 8/6/2009. (rlh) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 2 MOTION for Permanent Injunction MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by JOHN BERARDI, be denied. Objections to R&R due by 8/6/2009. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 7/20/09. (lrw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.