COTTILLION et al v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: JOHN COTTILLION and BEVERLY ELDRIDGE
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY, UNITED REFINING COMPANY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES, UNITED REFINING COMPANY RETIREMENT COMMITTEE and JOHN AND MARY DOES 1 TO 10
Case Number: 1:2009cv00140
Filed: June 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Sean J. McLaughlin
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 330 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. 292 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, consistent with the analyses herein; Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Confidential Mediation Communications (Doc. [302 ]) is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs' Motion to File Third Supplemental Declaration (Doc. 315 ) is GRANTED; and Plaintiffs' Motion for an Accounting (Doc. 316 ) is DENIED, with instructions. Also, on or before 7/14/16, the parties shall join tly file a proposed, signature-ready order awarding attorneys' fees in the correct amount, consistent with the analyses and guidelines set forth herein. If disputes exist, the parties may attach supporting materials, including short explanation (s) regarding any underlying calculations and/or methodologies. The parties' submissions shall not contain further argument regarding the matters already decided, although the Court now expressly holds that the submissions are made without prej udice to any arguments or positions that may be presented on appeal. In the event of a dispute, the Court will review the parties' submissions and, without further analysis, enter a proposed order that is most compliant, fair and reasonable. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/30/16. (dcd)
December 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER denying 272 Defendants' Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/23/14. (dcd)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 268 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification (Doc. 251 ) is DENIED; Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (filed with Doc. 254 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Doc. 252 ) is DENIED; Defendants' Mo tion to Substitute (Doc. 260 is DENIED; the certified class shall consist of the 193 individuals listed in Joint Exhibit 1 (and their beneficiaries under the Plan); judgment hereby is entered in favor of each of the individual certified class membe rs listed in Joint Exhibit 2, in the amounts indicated; and judgment hereby is entered in favor of Gary Berti, Janice Moore, Dennis Tuttle, Homer Morrison, and Stephen Widmer in the amounts set forth in the calculations provided by Defendants. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/24/14. (dcd)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 223 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 192 ) is GRANTED, as described; Plaintiffs' Motion Proposing Final Remedy (Doc. 203 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as described; Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 194 ) is GRANTED, and Counts I, II and III of the Amended Complaint, only, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By 12/6/13, the parties shall file written reports/stipulations regarding class composition and payment amounts. See Memorandum and Order filed herewith for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/5/13. (dcd)
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 186 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 138 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 153 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2013, for the reasons set forth in the a ccompanying MEMORANDOM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the anti-cutback claim set forth in Count IV of the Second Amended Complaint, and is otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as to Count IV and is otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 4/8/2013. (jdg)
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 65 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 04/18/2011. (kas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COTTILLION et al v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN COTTILLION
Represented By: Tybe A. Brett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEVERLY ELDRIDGE
Represented By: Tybe A. Brett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY RETIREMENT COMMITTEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN AND MARY DOES 1 TO 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?