WINSTON v. DANIELS et al
| MICHAEL WINSTON |
| KAREN DANIELS, JOHN PAVLOCK, WILLIAM TODD, RAY LEARN, TROOPER PALMER, BONII MOORE HOWARD and CHRISTOPHER ANTALICS |
| 1:2010cv00074 |
| March 31, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 8th Day of July, 2011, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that the motions to dismiss the complaint filed on behalf of Defendants Pavlock and Todd 16 , Defendant Palmer 21 , Defendant Antalics 30 , and Defendants Learn and Howard 33 shall be, and hereby are GRANTED and all claims against said Defendants under federal law shall be and hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff is asserting claims against these Defendants under state law, said claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the power granted to courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), Plaintiffs' federal claims again st Defendant Daniels shall be, and hereby are, DISMISSED with prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff is asserting claims against Defendant Daniels under state law, said claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 07/08/2011. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
