CRUM v. ASTRUE

CRUM v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	STEVEN LYNN CRUM
Defendant:	MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number:	1:2010cv00180
Filed:	July 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Erie Office
County:	Crawford
Presiding Judge:	Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 20, 2011	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 20th Day of July, 2011; IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 11 shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: (i) said motion is GRANTED to the extent that Pl aintiff seeks review and/or remand of the ALJ's decision, and (ii) said motion is DENIED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks a reversal of the ALJ's decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 shall be, and hereby is, DENIED, and the decision of the ALJ shall be, and hereby is, VACATED and REMANDED for further consideration not inconsistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and this Memorandum Order. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated June 29, 2011 16 , is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 07/20/2011. (kas)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 20, 2011

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 20th Day of July, 2011; IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 11 shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: (i) said motion is GRANTED to the extent that Pl aintiff seeks review and/or remand of the ALJ's decision, and (ii) said motion is DENIED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks a reversal of the ALJ's decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 shall be, and hereby is, DENIED, and the decision of the ALJ shall be, and hereby is, VACATED and REMANDED for further consideration not inconsistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and this Memorandum Order. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated June 29, 2011 16 , is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 07/20/2011. (kas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRUM v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEVEN LYNN CRUM
Represented By:	Richard J. Schubert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?