HAMMOND v. DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District HAMMOND v. DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION

HAMMOND v. DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION

Plaintiff:	GREGORY HAMMOND
Defendant:	DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION
Case Number:	1:2010cv00267
Filed:	November 8, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Erie Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2012	Filing 74 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 63 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by MALINDA ADAMS, SCI GRATERFORD/DOC OF PA, F. JABLONSKI, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, MAXINE OVERTON; 59 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by J. KORSZNIAK, DANIEL TELEGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/17/2012. (bb)
October 17, 2011	Filing 40 ORDER that Plaintiff's undated letter is deemed by the Court to be a Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint and a Motion for injunctive relief, and the Clerk's Office is ORDERED to file the letter as such. Plaintiff's lette r, deemed as a Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's Supplemental Complaint is due by 11/1/2011. The Defendants's Response to Plaintiff's deemed Motion for injunctive relief is due by 11/10/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10-17-2011. A copy of the order is being mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. (tmr)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2012

Filing 74 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 63 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by MALINDA ADAMS, SCI GRATERFORD/DOC OF PA, F. JABLONSKI, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, MAXINE OVERTON; 59 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by J. KORSZNIAK, DANIEL TELEGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/17/2012. (bb)

October 17, 2011

Filing 40 ORDER that Plaintiff's undated letter is deemed by the Court to be a Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint and a Motion for injunctive relief, and the Clerk's Office is ORDERED to file the letter as such. Plaintiff's lette r, deemed as a Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's Supplemental Complaint is due by 11/1/2011. The Defendants's Response to Plaintiff's deemed Motion for injunctive relief is due by 11/10/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10-17-2011. A copy of the order is being mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. (tmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAMMOND v. DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: GREGORY HAMMOND
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DEPT CORRECTIONS OF PENNA/ALBION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?