MAYER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. DINSICK EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
| MAYER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. |
| DINSICK EQUIPMENT CORPORATION |
| 1:2011cv00014 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 10/10/14. (bdb)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to hold Defendant and its Principals in Contempt of Court. In light of Defendant's repeated and willful failure to respond to this Courts orders, and consistent with Rule 37(b)(2)(vii) and this Court's inherent power to enforce its own orders, Plaintiff's motion to hold Defendant in contempt is GRANTED. In order to ensure that Defendant satisfies his discovery obligations, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendant to provide full an d complete responses to Plaintiff's Interrogatories in Aid of Execution and to designate a representative for the purpose of taking a deposition in aid of execution within twenty days of this date. If Defendant fails to comply within that time, or provide an explanation as to why he cannot do so, a fine of $200.00 per day will be imposed and will accrue until such time as Defendant complies. Signed by Chief Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 8/16/2013. (jdg)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Response to Interrogatories in Aid of Execution; granting 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Defendant is hereby ORDERED to provide full and complete responses to Plaintiff's Interroga tories in Aid of Execution within twenty days of the date of this Memorandum Order. Defendant is further ORDERED to designate a representative for the purpose of taking a deposition in aid of execution within twenty days. Defendant is also ORDERED t o pay those expenses, including attorney's fees, which the Court determines to be reasonably related to the preparation and prosecution of the instant Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's counsel shall provide the Court with any affidavits or other materials in support of the amount or reasonableness of attorneys fees and expenses within ten days. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 3/2/2012. (jdg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MAYER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. DINSICK EQUIPMENT CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MAYER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | William J. Schaaf |
| Represented By: | Andrew M. Schmidt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DINSICK EQUIPMENT CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
