BILLINGS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner: KEITH BILLINGS
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 1:2011cv00067
Filed: March 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: McKean
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KEITH BILLINGS is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of Courts is directed to close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/19/12. (lrw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BILLINGS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEITH BILLINGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: Megan Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?