DELAWARE & HUDSON RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. et al v. KNOEDLER MANUFACTURERS, INC. et al
DELAWARE & HUDSON RAILWAY COMPANY, INC., SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED |
KNOEDLER MANUFACTURERS, INC. and DURHAM INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC. |
1:2011cv00314 |
December 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
Erie |
Sean J. McLaughlin |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 261 RULING on Defendant Knoedler Objections to Plaintiffs Counter-Deposition Designations 237 . Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein. (fdr) |
Filing 251 ORDER denying 147 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 10/26/2018 (fdr) |
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 35 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 41 Defendant Knoedler's Motion to Dismiss; granting 42 Defendant Durham's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2 013, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Knoedler Manufacturers, Inc. and Durham Industrial Sales, Inc. are GRANTED. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Durham and Knoedler and against Plaintiffs. Signed by Chief Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 8/1/2013. (jdg) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 17 Durham's Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Knoedler's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2013, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Mem orandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Knoedler Manufacturers, Inc. and Durham Industrial Sales, Inc. are GRANTED. Plaintiffs' cla im for indemnification is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract is dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiffs are ordered to file an amended complaint restating their breach of contract claim on or before February 28, 2013. Immediately thereafter, a 90-day period of jurisdictional discovery will be ordered with respect to the personal jurisdiction challenge raised by Durham.Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 2/12/2013. (jdg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.