MILLER v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ERIE COUNTY, PA et al
| EMMANUEL JOSH MILLER |
| COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ERIE COUNTY, PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA |
| 1:2012cv00206 |
| September 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Maurice B. Cohill |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 31 Motion to Vacate a Void Judgment. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 1/10/2014. (rtw)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 27 Report and Recommendation, dated September 19, 2013 as the Opinion of the court. Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; a Certificate of Appealability is denied; and Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Fed Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Rule of Appellate Procedure 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 30 days. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 10/21/13. (rtw)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation re 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is Denied. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 12/28/2012. (rtw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
