STOVIC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Plaintiff: CHRIS STOVIC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00090
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Erie Office
County: McKean
Presiding Judge: Sean J. McLaughlin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151 Railway Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 10, 2013 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, the Board's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5 ) is granted without prejudice, and this matter will be transferred to the docket of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/10/13. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STOVIC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRIS STOVIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?