ELLIOTT v. WETZEL et al
| GEORGE GREGORY ELLIOTT |
| MICHAEL HARLOW, JOHN E. WETZEL and MELINDA KELLY |
| 1:2013cv00142 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Crawford |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER STAYING CASE: AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2013, upon consideration of the fact that Petitioner is currently exhausting his state court remedies with respect to his claim that his judgment of sentence is unconstitutional under Miller v. A labama, U.S., 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012), and that Respondents have advised the Court that they do not object to this case being stayed while the Petitioner exhausts his state court remedies [see ECF No. 10], it is HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) this case is STAYED and AMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending the exhaustion of Petitioner's remedies in state court; and, (2) within 30 days of the completion of the state court proceeding, Petitioner's counsel shall file a motion with this Court in which he requests that the stay in this case be lifted and advises the Court of the outcome of the state court proceeding. Signed by Chief Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 08/16/2013. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
