BIERLEY v. SAMBROAK
Plaintiff: HARRY L. BIERLEY
Defendant: ROBERT SAMBROAK
Case Number: 1:2013cv00326
Filed: October 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2382
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating, for reasons stated more fully within, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss will be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike will be denied as moot. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/25/14. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BIERLEY v. SAMBROAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT SAMBROAK
Represented By: Matthew J. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HARRY L. BIERLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?