CARNAHAN v. STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District CARNAHAN v. STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION

CARNAHAN v. STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	JULIE CARNAHAN
Defendant:	STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION
Case Number:	1:2013cv00353
Filed:	December 6, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Erie Office
County:	McKean
Presiding Judge:	Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit:	False Claims Act
Cause of Action:	31 U.S.C. § 3729
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 29, 2014	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 15 is DENIED. Plaintiff has until November 12, 2014 to file an Amended Complaint in light of the ruling in Foglia v. Renal Ventures Management, LLC, 754 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 2014). In the event that Plaintiff believes Foglia has no application to this matter, she may stand on her original complaint. After November 12, 2014, this Court will issue a scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 10/29/14. (lrw)
September 30, 2014	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiff has until October 21, 2014, to file an Amended Complaint in light of the ruling in Foglia v. Renal Ventures Management, LLC, 754 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. June 6, 2014). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss 4 be dismissed as moot. After October 21, 2014, Defendant may file or renew its motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 9/30/14. (lrw)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 29, 2014

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 15 is DENIED. Plaintiff has until November 12, 2014 to file an Amended Complaint in light of the ruling in Foglia v. Renal Ventures Management, LLC, 754 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 2014). In the event that Plaintiff believes Foglia has no application to this matter, she may stand on her original complaint. After November 12, 2014, this Court will issue a scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 10/29/14. (lrw)

September 30, 2014

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiff has until October 21, 2014, to file an Amended Complaint in light of the ruling in Foglia v. Renal Ventures Management, LLC, 754 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. June 6, 2014). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss 4 be dismissed as moot. After October 21, 2014, Defendant may file or renew its motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 9/30/14. (lrw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARNAHAN v. STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JULIE CARNAHAN
Represented By:	Arthur D. Martinucci
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STERLING MEDICAL CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?