QADR v. OVERMYER et al
| NUR QADR |
| MICHEAL OVERMYER, OBERLANDER, J. HORTON, DOMBROSKI, WILLIAM COLE, C. KENNEDY, SEIGAL, JOHN DOE, MCQUOWN, JOHN/JANE DOE, SMITH, RN and HAVEWOOD |
| 1:2014cv00123 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Forest |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed in the above-captioned case with respect to Defendants Mr. Michael Overmyer, Mr. Oberlander, Deputy J. Horton, Mr. Dombroski , Mr. William Cole, Ms. C. Kennedy, Ms. Seigal, Mr. McQuown, and Ms. Smith, RN, is dismissed for failure to prosecute.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is to mark the case closed as there are no Defendants remaining in the case. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/22/2015. (smc)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 41 Report and Recommendations.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed in the above-captioned case with respect to Defendant Doctor Havewood is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/8/2015. (smc)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed in the above-captioned case with respect to Defendants John Doe, Food Service Manager and John/Jane Doe, Corrections Healthcare Administrator is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/30/2015. (smc)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 9 Motion To Order Prison Accountant to provide six month inmate account statement, albeit without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new motion properly supported by an affidavit from Plaintiff explaining what efforts he made to have t he Prison Accountant provide such six month inmate account statement. Plaintiff's new properly supported motion is due no later than September 17, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/2/2014. A copy of the Order along with this Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Plaintiff at his address of record via first class mail. The Court is sending Plaintiff this Order and NEF under both names of "Nur Qadr" and "Jeffrey Pratt." In addition, a copy of the order is being sent to the inmate account officer via first class mail. (tmr)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER re 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by NUR QADR, 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by NUR QADR. It is ordered that because the case is closed due to Plaintiff's failure to correct, as previously ordered, deficiencies in his IFP application, no action will be taken on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction or on the Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff may reopen the case by either paying the filing fee or by properly filling out an IFP application and the Authorizat ion Form by September 17, 2014 or the case will be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 8/19/2014. A copy of the Order together with enclosures and this Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Plaintiff via first class mail at his address of record in two different envelopes, one being addressed under the name of "Nur Qadr" and the second being addressed under the name of "Jeffrey Pratt." (tmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
