REIHNER et al v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
WILLIAM REIHNER, JENNIFER REIHNER and CAMERON REIHNER |
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSISTANT DA MICHAEL FAGELLA, WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE JOHN DISALLE and ATTORNEY PETE MARCOLINE BLACKWELL AND ASSOCIATES |
1:2015cv00143 |
June 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
Erie |
Barbara Rothstein |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss filed by each of the Defendants (Docs. 6 , 27 , 30 ) are GRANTED. The clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/4/15. (jwr) ***Staff Note: A copy of this memorandum and order was mailed to the Plaintiffs at their addresses of record via First Class US Mail. |
Filing 35 ORDER denying 34 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 26 Motion for Default Judgment. As more fully stated in the Order filed herewith, the Motions filed at Documents 25 , 26 , and 34 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/2/2015. (rld) Staff note: Copies of the Order have been mailed to Plaintiffs via First Class U.S. Mail at their addresses of record. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.