ALLAH v. RECHTENWALD
Petitioner: UNIQUE ALLAH
Respondent: M. RECHTENWALD
Case Number: 1:2015cv00267
Filed: November 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: McKean
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. The Court HEREBY ORDERS the following: (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation; (2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and (3) This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein on October 17, 2016. (SMB).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALLAH v. RECHTENWALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UNIQUE ALLAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. RECHTENWALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?