SARVEY v WETZEL et al
MELISSA SARVEY |
JOHN WETZEL, JOANNE TORMA, JOYCE WILKES, KEITH MAYO and BRIAN SHANK |
1:2016cv00157 |
June 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION The motion for summary judgment of Defendants John Wetzel, Joanne Torma, Joyce Wilkes, and Brian Shank is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied as to Plaintiff Sarvey's claim for injunctive relief and nominal damages against John Wetzel, Joanne Torma and Lonnie Oliver (as successor to Torma). The motion is granted in all other respects. An appropriate order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 1/16/2019. (dm) |
Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION that 26 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by BRIAN SHANK, JOHN WETZEL, JOYCE WILKES, JOANNE TORMA will be denied. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 3/28/18. (lrw) |
Filing 18 ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 3/1/2017. (jds) |
Filing 3 ORDER adopting 2 Report and Recommendations; ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Plaintiff's action shall be transferred to USDCWDPA.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/21/16. (jam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.