SPENCE V. COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff: SHERRY SPENCE
Defendant: COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 1:2016cv00239
Filed: September 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Barbara Rothstein
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 9/29/16. (ga)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPENCE V. COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHERRY SPENCE
Represented By: Amy L Bennecoff Ginsburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Represented By: Terance A. Gonsalves
Represented By: Joshua S. Snyder
Represented By: William L. Stang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?