LAWSON v. OVERMYER et al

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2019	Filing 99 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion to Compel Disclosure of Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs motion essentially seeks two things: (1) copies of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and related filings, and (2) an exte nsion of time to respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will provide Plaintiff an additional thirty days from the date of this order to file his Response in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. That response is now du e on or before March 11, 2019. Because of the voluminous nature of Defendants summary judgment papers, the Court is not providing copies to Plaintiff at his time. However, the Plaintiff is instructed to notify the Court in the event he has not rece ived copies of the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Brief in Support, Concise Statement of Material Fact, and Appendix, as well as the Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiffs Concise Statement of Material Fact by March 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 2/12/2019. (dm)
November 7, 2017	Filing 31 ORDER adopting 29 Report and Recommendation and denying 24 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 11/7/2017. (jds)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

• Search for Party Aliases
• Associated Cases
• Attorneys
• Case File Location
• Case Summary
• Docket Report
• History/Documents
• Parties
• Related Transactions
• Check Status