RAMBERT v. OVERMYER et al
| ERIC X. RAMBERT |
| MICHAEL OVERMYER, BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, JOHN N. DEITRICT, CARRINGTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, JOHN E. WETZEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 1:2017cv00042 |
| February 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Forest |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; denying 17 Motion for TRO or Preliminary Injunction; denying Certificate of Appealability; and adopting 19 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/14/18. (njt)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM ORDER that all of Petitioner's future submissions must be presented for filing in compliance with our Local Rules, and specifically Local Rule 5.1(C), a copy of which is attached hereto, and provides as follows, "The lettering an d typeface shall be on only one (1) side of a page." Any future filing by Petitioner that is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1(C), no matter in what case, will be returned to Petitioner along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on February 16, 2017. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
