MOLSON v. JOHNSON et al
| ROWENA MOLSON |
| JUDGE SHAD CONNELLY, ANGELA BROOKS, BRIAN D. SANDRICH, JUDGE JOHN GAHART, LINDA STEVICK, JOHN MOORE and WAYNE GUSTAVA JOHNSON, JR. |
| 1:2018cv00336 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in this Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is GRANTED; and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 11/9/18. (lrw)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION that Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 11/9/18. (lrw)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROWENA MOLSON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2018: #6 Consent to Magistrate Judge or District Judge Option) (ept). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
