BROWN v. NEWELL et al
LORI BROWN |
LIEUTENANT BILL HARMON, JOHN DOES 1-2 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFERY NEWELL |
1:2018cv00377 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER on Civil Motion Practice. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/10/19. (lrw) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Kennedy on behalf of BILL HARMON, JEFFERY NEWELL. (Kennedy, Michael) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LORI BROWN. BILL HARMON waiver sent on 12/10/2018, answer due 2/8/2019. (Schmidt, Andrew) Modified text on 1/9/2019 to indicate correct date waiver was sent and answer is due. (ksa) |
Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LORI BROWN. JEFFERY NEWELL waiver sent on 12/10/2018, answer due 2/8/2019. (Schmidt, Andrew) Modified text on 1/9/2019 to indicate correct date waiver was sent and answer is due. (ksa) |
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from BILL HARMON on 2/8/2019; JEFFERY NEWELL on 2/8/2019. (ksa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-2, BILL HARMON, JEFFERY NEWELL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4956629), filed by LORI BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.