GINGERICH v. TICE et al
ALBERT GINGERICH |
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY |
1:2019cv00163 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Answer or Motion to Dismiss due by 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/22/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dm) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019; ERIC TICE served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (av) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (DiGiacomo, Paula) |
Filing 6 ORDER having reviewed Petitioner's Response #4 to Order to Show Cause #2 , the Court has determined NOT to impose a sanction of $150.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/1/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dm) |
Filing 5 Response to Order to Show Cause re #2 Order to Show cause Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus corrected by ALBERT GINGERICH. Reason for Correction: The petition sent wrong. (Andrezeski, Anthony) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #4 Response to Order to Show Cause. ERROR: Incorrect document attached. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to refile the document, using the Errata event and attach the correct document. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by ALBERT GINGERICH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Order) (Andrezeski, Anthony) |
Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. The parties are allowed 14 days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72(C)(2). DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 6/7/2019. (dm) |
Service copies placed in US Marshal box. (dm) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Attorney Anthony B. Andrezeski shall show cause within 10 days of the date of this order why said attorney should not be required to pay a processing fee and sanctions of $150.00 for failure to file a document with this Court electronically by use of the CM/ECF system. Failure to show cause will result in the imposition of the sanction fee, which must be paid from the funds of the attorney or his law firm. Counsel may not charge to or collect the $150.00 from the client as a fee, cost, expense, or other charge in this case. Show Cause Response due by 6/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 6/5/2019. (dm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.