JONES v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
| JAMIL JONES |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WARDEN OF THE ERIE COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY |
| 1:2019cv00203 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Service copies placed in US Marshal box. (dm)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER The Clerk is directed to terminate the Erie County Court of Common Pleas and add the Warden of the Erie County Prison and the District Attorney of Erie County as Respondents in this matter. It is further ordered that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/4/2019. (dm)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 14668004234), filed by JAMIL JONES. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (av)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
