LUNA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
MICHAEL A. LUNA |
MS. ADAMS and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
1:2020cv00187 |
July 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER Petitioner has not submitted the following two documents which are required to proceed in forma pauperis: 1) a certificate from the superintendent or other appropriate officer at his correctional institution showing the amount of money or securities that he has in any account in the institution; and 2) a certified copy of his institutional account statement from every jail or prison at which he was confined for the 6-month period leading up to the date the account statement is submitted. To proceed with this habeas action in forma pauperis, Petitioner must submit those required documents on or before August 22, 2020. Alternatively, Petitioner may elect to proceed with this case by simply paying the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/24/2020. (dm) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL A. LUNA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Habeas Petition Pending Disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.