GUNTER v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
| TREY GUNTER |
| SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY |
| 1:2020cv00255 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. The parties are allowed 14 days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72(C)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/25/2020. (dm)
|
|
Filing 2
RECEIPT from TREY GUNTER for HABEAS FILING FEE received on 9/2/2020 (elt)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 14668004686), filed by TREY GUNTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (elt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
