MERTSOCK v. WATSON et al
| DANNY MERTSOCK |
| KORD KINNEY, POTTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and ANDY WATSON |
| 1:2020cv00314 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Western has been opened in Middle District of Pennsylvania as case 4:20-cv-02317, filed 12/10/2020. (jv) |
Filing 3
ORDER that this case be transferred forthwith to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1404(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 12/10/2020. (dm)
|
| Case electronically transferred to District of Middle Pennsylvania. (jjg) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by DANNY MERTSOCK. (jv) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANNY MERTSOCK. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion to relieve the Potter County District Attorneys Office from Prosecution of pending matter, #4 Motion to have D.A. Watson, Assistant D.A. Kinney and the Potter County District Attorneys Office removed as the Prosecution entity in everything concerning pending matter, #5 Exhibit, #6 Envelope) (jv) Modified on 12/10/2020 (lar). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
