DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
| ULYSSES S. DIAZ |
| SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL OVERMYER, PA. DOC. DEREK F. OBERLANDER, UNIT SGT. MAHONEY, SGT. MEALLY, DR. EISENMAN, MS. STEINER, MR. LEE, C.O. MCCANDLESS, C.O. BARNES and MR. MILLER |
| 1:2021cv00044 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case administratively closed, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 2/4/2021. (dm)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 1/19/2021. (dm)
|
| Filing 3 Remark: USM-285 forms returned to Plaintiff for completion. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ULYSSES S. DIAZ. (jv) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ULYSSES S. DIAZ. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Envelope) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
