DANIELS v. CLARK et al
| SEAN DANIELS |
| PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE SECRETARY DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, SUPERINTENDENT MICAHEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 1:2021cv00069 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole shall file the Answer on behalf of all Respondents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 2/4/2021. (dm)
|
| Service copies mailed to US Marshal in Pittsburgh. (dm) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by SEAN DANIELS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Envelope) (jd) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by SEAN DANIELS. (jd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668067064), filed by SEAN DANIELS. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
