ACKERMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
| JONATHAN E. ACKERMAN and JONATHAN JASON BARTOSEK |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPT. OF MONROE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX-TWIN RIVERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 1:2021cv00091 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER The Clerk is directed to add the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, the District Attorney of Warren County, and the Superintendent of the Monroe Correctional Complex-Twin Rivers as Respondents. The Clerk is further directed to terminate the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this Order, together with a copy of the Petition [ECF No. #3 ] upon Respondents: (1) the Superintendent of the Monroe Correctional Complex-Twin Rivers; (2) the District Attorney of Warren County; and (3) the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. Service shall be by certified mail. Costs to be advanced by the United States of America. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. The parties are allowed 14 days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72(C)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 4/20/2021. (dm)
|
|
Filing 7
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668068099), filed by JONATHAN E. ACKERMAN. (dm)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing fee: $5, receipt number 24668068099 (jjg)
|
|
Filing 5
Case transferred in from District of Washington Western; Case Number 2:21-cv-00176. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo added. (jjg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITION re #1 Proposed Document(s) filed by Jonathan E Ackerman, by Judge Richard A. Jones. The Clerk shall TRANSFER this case to the Western District ofPennsylvania, in the interests of justice, under 28 U.S.C. 1631. The Clerk is directed to close this case and transfer all original documents to the Western District of Pennsylvania.**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Ackerman, Prisoner ID: 407195)(SG)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner Jonathan E Ackerman. (NOTE: this document is a duplicate to #1 Proposed 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; 3/15/2021 IFP deficiency deadline remains pending) **16 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Ackerman, Prisoner ID: 407195)(GMR)
|
|
Filing 2
LETTER sent to Petitioner re case number, judicial assignment and IFP deficiency: - The filing fee requirement must be met. Please submit either the full $5.00 filing fee or an application for In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status. An IFP form is enclosed for your convenience. Filer has until 3/15/2021 to correct. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form Habeas Corpus) **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Ackerman, Prisoner ID: 407195)(KMC)
|
|
Filing 1
PROPOSED 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner Jonathan E Ackerman. (No IFP/No Filing Fee) **16 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Ackerman, Prisoner ID: 407195)(KMC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
