THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
JOHN M. CLARK and JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC |
1:2021cv00166 |
June 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by JOHN M. CLARK, JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Davis, Lee) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Bentz, Amy) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. Waiver sent on 6/25/2021. Answer due date 8/27/2021 JOHN M. CLARK, JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Bollman, Sean) Modified text on 7/9/2021 to add defendants names. (lar) Modified text on 7/21/2021 to add Answer due date. (lar) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee Davis on behalf of JOHN M. CLARK, JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Davis, Lee) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JOHN M. CLARK (lar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN M. CLARK, JM CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6578910), filed by THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (lar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.