MURPHY v. THE TOT BABY CORPORATION
| ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY |
| THE TOT BABY CORPORATION |
| 1:2021cv00209 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Joshua D. Levin-Epstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/23/2021. (dm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Jason Mizrahi to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/23/2021. (dm)
|
| Filing 11 Proposed Order by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION Affiant: Joshua D. Levin-Epstein, Esq.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Joshua D. Levin-Epstein, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6722207) by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: FILERS ADVISED THAT IN THE FUTURE, THESE DOCUMENTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILED AS ONE ENTRY, WITHTHE MOTION BEING THE MAIN DOCUMENT, AND AFFIDAVIT, EXHIBIT CERTIFICATE AND PROPOSED ORDER AS ATTACHMENTS. CORRECTION: NO ACTION REQUIRED. (jd) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Order by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION Affiant: Jason Mizrahi, Esq.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Jason Mizrahi, Esq to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6721833) by THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Mizrahi on behalf of THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Levin-Epstein on behalf of THE TOT BABY CORPORATION. (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. THE TOT BABY CORPORATION served on 8/13/2021, answer due 9/3/2021. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THE TOT BABY CORPORATION (lyk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE TOT BABY CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6633732), filed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lyk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MURPHY v. THE TOT BABY CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence H. Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE TOT BABY CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Jason Mizrahi |
| Represented By: | Joshua Levin-Epstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
