OKE v. NAREHOOD et al
| AYODELE OKE |
| C.O. NAREHOOD, C.O. IRE and C.O. CUMMINS |
| 1:2021cv00261 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against CUMMINS, IRE, NAREHOOD, filed by AYODELE OKE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lyk) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and the Clerk is instructed to file the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the complaint, notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, and waiver and this order to each defendant as directed by plaintiff. Costs shall be borne by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 11/5/2021. (dm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AYODELE OKE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lyk) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/29/2021. (dm)
|
| Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
