SAMUELS v. OVERMYER et al
| LARRY RAFIQ SAMUELS |
| (FRM) SUPERINTENDENT M. OVERMYER, SUPERINTENDENT DEREK OBERLANDER, LT. WALKER and LT. DICKEY |
| 1:2021cv00324 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by LARRY RAFIQ SAMUELS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 1/3/2022. (dm)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LARRY RAFIQ SAMUELS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LARRY RAFIQ SAMUELS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit A1, #3 Exhibit A2, #4 Exhibit B1, #5 Exhibit B3, #6 Exhibit C1, #7 Exhibit C2, #8 Exhibit C3, #9 Exhibit C5, #10 Petition for Injunctive Relief, #11 Subpoena Requests, #12 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #13 Brief in Support of Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #14 Exhibit B1 for Brief in Support, #15 Exhibit B2 for Brief in Support, #16 Exhibit B3 for Brief in Support, #17 Envelope) (kss)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
