DELHUNTY et al v. FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON
| CARISSA DELHUNTY and RENEE FOUST |
| FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON |
| 1:2022cv00030 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney Appearance by Courtney C Brennan on behalf of FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON. Attorney Samantha Farrell terminated. (Brennan, Courtney) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON. FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON waiver sent on 2/1/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Rebelo, Mary-Jo) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Farrell on behalf of FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON. (Farrell, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary-Jo Rebelo on behalf of FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON. (Rebelo, Mary-Jo) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON (lyk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FARMERS NATIONAL BANK OF EMLENTON (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6923057), filed by CARISSA DELHUNTY, RENEE FOUST. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lyk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
