MURPHY v. LE SPORTSAC, INC.
ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY |
LE SPORTSAC, INC. |
1:2022cv00058 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Errata re 9 Consent to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option by LE SPORTSAC, INC.. Reason for Correction: Incorrect filer chosen. (Ziegler, J.) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
Filing 7 INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Case Management set for 4/25/2022 at 11:30 AM in Telephone Conference before Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 4/15/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 3/24/2022. (dm) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 4/7/2022, the parties shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. Consent to Jurisdiction by Mag. Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned due by 4/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 3/24/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dm) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement identifying ITOCHU Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate, by LE SPORTSAC, INC.. (Ziegler, J.) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief by LE SPORTSAC, INC.. (Ziegler, J.) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. LE SPORTSAC, INC. served on 3/2/2022, answer due 3/23/2022. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to LE SPORTSAC, INC. (sdp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LE SPORTSAC, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6954623), filed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MURPHY v. LE SPORTSAC, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY | |
Represented By: | Lawrence H. Fisher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LE SPORTSAC, INC. | |
Represented By: | J. David Ziegler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.