FULLER v. OBERLANDER et al
| RONALD FULLER |
| D. OBERLANDER, D. PERRY, SMITH, SHEFFER and WISE |
| 1:2022cv00119 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case administratively closed, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff may reopen the case by (i) tendering to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court," a statutory filing fee in the amount of $350.00, plus an administrative filing fee in the amount of $52.00, for a total of $402.00 or (ii) submitting another motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 6/1/2022. (dm)
|
| Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by RONALD FULLER. (jd) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 4/11/2022. (dm)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RONALD FULLER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
