TINSON v. HAINSWORTH et al.
CARNELL J. TINSON |
SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY |
1:2022cv00214 |
July 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CARNELL J. TINSON. (kss) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $5, receipt number 100000001 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. Petitioner may reopen this case if, by September 9, 2022, Petitioner either pays the $5.00 filing fee, or files a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis along with the following two documents: (i) a certificate from the superintendent or other appropriate officer at his correctional institution showing the amount of money or securities that she has in any account in the institution; and, (ii) a certified copy of his institutional account statement from every jail or prison at which he was confined for the 6-month period leading up to the date the account statement is submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/9/2022. (dlh) |
Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.