ROSA-DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
| GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ |
| OBERLANDER, PERRY, FISCUS, CAPT. CARTER, CUSTER, COSTANZO, HOOG, SCHLEMMER and MOSLAK |
| 1:2022cv00239 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE to the Court (MOTION For Courts Alertness and Awareness) by GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) Modified on 9/22/2022 (dlh). |
Filing 10
ORDER The United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the complaint, notice of lawsuit, request for waiver of service of summons, waiver, and this order to defendant as directed by plaintiff. Costs shall be advanced by the government. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/25/2022. (dlh)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/17/2022. (dlh)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting [ECF No. 7] Plaintiff's Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal. Service copies of the Complaint and other appropriate forms have been received and will be transmitted in due course to the United States Marshal Service for service. Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on August 11, 2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jbh)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshal re #1 Complaint by GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal. Once Plaintiff has complied with this Court's Order regarding the submission of service copies, see ECF No. 5, the Marshal will be directed to serve the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/5/22. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jdg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Plaintiff shall provide the Court with proper instructions for service upon each of the nine named Defendants listed in the Complaint including a U.S. Marshal Form 285 for each defendant, a completed notice and waiver of summons for each defendant on or before 9/1/2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Court with one complete copy of his 26-page Complaint for service upon each of the nine named Defendants listed in the Complaint on or before 9/1/2022. As the copies of the Complaint are being used for service and are not being filed, there may be printing on both sides of a page. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/2/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dlh)
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 1466805243 (jd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshal re #1 Complaint WITHOUT Prepayment of Marshal Fee by GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ. (jd) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ. (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAPT. CARTER, COSTANZO, CUSTER, FISCUS, HOOG, MOSLAK, OBERLANDER, PERRY, SCHLEMMER Filing fee $402 PAID ), filed by GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
