MURPHY v. CEREBELLY, INC.
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY
Defendant: CEREBELLY, INC.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00298
Filed: October 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Referring Judge: Richard A Lanzillo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting re #14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/13/2023. (snc)
January 11, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY (Fisher, Lawrence)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING; The Parties, through counsel, have notified the Court that an agreement has been reached to conclude this action. See ECF No. #12 . In light of this agreement, the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED as of today's date. Any and all deadlines previously imposed are hereby suspended. Nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter and the Court will retain jurisdiction should further proceedings become necessary. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375 (1994). Counsel are hereby ordered to file a joint Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) on or before January 27, 2023. Should said Stipulation not be filed by that date, Counsel for the Plaintiff is to file a written status report updating the Court on the progress made toward effectuating the settlement. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 12/14/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (snc)
December 14, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Conclusion of Action by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY (Fisher, Lawrence)
December 5, 2022 Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by CEREBELLY, INC.. (Stuart, Daniel)
November 28, 2022 Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Fisher, Lawrence)
November 22, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin W. Tucker on behalf of ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Tucker, Kevin)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 12/5/2022, the parties shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. Consent to Jurisdiction by Mag. Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned due by 12/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 11/21/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dlh)
November 18, 2022 Filing 7 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by CEREBELLY, INC.. (Stuart, Daniel)
November 18, 2022 Filing 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by CEREBELLY, INC. Answer due from CEREBELLY, INC. on 12/19/2022. (Stuart, Daniel)
November 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Stuart on behalf of CEREBELLY, INC.. (Stuart, Daniel)
November 18, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan D. Marcus on behalf of CEREBELLY, INC.. (Marcus, Jonathan)
October 27, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. CEREBELLY, INC. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Fisher, Lawrence)
October 17, 2022 Judge Robert J. Colville added. (av)
October 17, 2022 Judge Robert J. Colville no longer assigned to case. (av)
October 17, 2022 Judge Susan Paradise Baxter added. (av)
October 14, 2022 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo. Judge Susan Paradise Baxter no longer assigned to the case. (elt)
October 14, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CEREBELLY, INC. (av)
October 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7343515), filed by ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Fisher, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MURPHY v. CEREBELLY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY
Represented By: Lawrence H. Fisher
Represented By: Kevin W. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CEREBELLY, INC.
Represented By: Jonathan D. Marcus
Represented By: Daniel J. Stuart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?